Abstract
This study investigated the usage of the Internet among mass media communication students. Additionally, fine arts students are compared according to the sub-variable Gender, Parents’ Educational status, and Digital devices. The researcher employed survey method and collected the data in person. Four-point scale questionnaires were used to collect data in this research. In such a context, the data was collected among 152 mass media communication students who were studying in second level degree. Finally, this study has found that do not show any significant difference in usage of Internet between the demographic variables gender, parents' educational status such as male and female, school education and higher education. Though, has been found that there is a significant difference in usage of Internet among the demographic variable of digital devices use mostly such as cell phone, laptop, desktop, cell phone with others.
Publisher
Granthaalayah Publications and Printers
Reference33 articles.
1. A, K. R. and K. (2005). Internet and its use in the Engineering College of Punjab, India A case study. Webology, 2(4), 1–18.
2. Al-Ansari, H. (2006). Internet use by the faculty members of Kuwait University. Electronic Library, 24(6), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610714224
3. Alkis, C. (2005). A student ’ s perspective. Paper given at the Institute of Historical Research’s Conference History in Schools and Higher Education: Issues of Common Concern, 29th September 2005, 36(2), 12–13. http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/4347/1/A_student’s_perspective_-_Cemil_Alkis.pdf
4. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet Use by Teachers : Conditions of Professional Use and Teacher-Directed Student Use Report # 1 Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations The Universit. 1–35. http://www.cyberbullyingprevention.com/teachers/internet-used-by-teachers.pdf
5. Berger, K. A., & Topol, M. T. (2001). Technology to Enhance Learning: Use of a Web Site Platform in Traditional Classes and Distance Learning. Marketing Education Review, 11(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2001.11488754