COMPARISON OF WRITTEN ASSESSMENT TOOLS OF BUSINESS MATHEMATICS IN THE FACULTY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION BASED ON BLOOM’S TAXONOMY-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

COMPARISON OF WRITTEN ASSESSMENT TOOLS OF BUSINESS MATHEMATICS IN THE FACULTY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION BASED ON BLOOM’S TAXONOMY

Published:2018-06-30 Issue:6 Volume:6 Page:119-130
ISSN:2350-0530
Container-title:International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH
language:
Short-container-title:Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah

Author:

Sabur Abdus,Sina Abu,Kumar Sarker Sanjoy

Abstract

The teaching learning is a continuous process by which the educators involving in this field are working to change the behavior of the students as the required human resources for the welfare of the society. Bloom’s Taxonomy is the most important and widely used process that helps the educators to provide the students equipped with knowledge perfectly in the different domains of the learning skills as suggested by Benjamin Bloom. To assess the learning skills written test is the very important tools that are applying on the students from the beginning of the formal education. In this paper an attempt has been taken to evaluate the allocation pattern of the marks of the course Business Mathematics of the three departments Accounting and Information System, Management and Finance & Banking under business faculty according to the components of Bloom’s Taxonomy. It is observed that there is a significant difference of the allocations of marks among the selected the three departments regarding the cognitive domain of the B.T. But no significant difference has been found in the allocation pattern of marks throughout the academic years under review. The marks allocation in LOCQ, IOCQ and HOCQ are found to be 43 percent 52 percent and 5 percent respectively which are not suited with the recommended marks allocation according to the recognized system. The suggestions and recommendation have been given to allocate the marks to prepare the written questions papers according to the cognitive domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy

Publisher

Granthaalayah Publications and Printers

Subject

Ocean Engineering

Reference21 articles.

1. Anderson, L. W. (2005). Objectives, evaluation, and the importamt of education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 100-113.

2. Singun, A. J. (November 3rd, 4th 2016). Application-based test bluprint for a sammatative classroom assessment. Procedings of the 10th International Management Conference (Pp. 170-181). Romania: Bucharest.

3. Sivarman, S. H., & Krishna, D. (September 2015). Blooms Taxonomy-applications in exam papers sssesment. International Journal Of Multidiscipplainary Science And Engineering, Vol.6, No.9 pp, pp. 5-8.

4. K, J., W. Z. A, W. M., Ghazali, N., W. N, W. J., S, S., & S. N. A, A. (2011). Allocation Marks Model for Examination Based on Bloom"s Taxonomy. International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Control (pp. 53-60). Singapore: LACSIT Press, Singapore.

5. Adiguzel, O. C. (2013). Teacher recruitment in Turkey: Analysis of teacher selection exams in comparison with Revised Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives . Academ, ISSN 1990-3839,Vol. 8(21), pp. 2136-2146.