The Concept of Miracle in Religious Discourse (Semantic Features of Russian and Chinese Cultures in the Perspective of Intercultural Communication)

Author:

Arinin E. I.1ORCID,Lyutaeva M. S.1ORCID,Liu Kun1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Vladimir State University

Abstract

The relevance of studying the processes of religious consciousness comes from the importance to ensure more coordinated interaction of scientific communities in intercultural communication. The PRC remains one of the key partners of the Russian Federation and partnership requires deeper understanding of the counterpart. This paper analyses social phenomena classified as miracles in Russian and Chinese cultures from the perspective of intercultural communication. To achieve this goal, the authors 1) highlight key theoretical approaches to the study of the semantics of miracle; 2) systematize the available data on key concepts and denotations of the semantics of miracle in Russian culture and supplement existing approaches; 3) establish the key features of the semantics of miracle in Chinese culture; 4) outline approaches to creating a sketch of a universal semantic model of a miracle as an invariant of two cultures; 5) identify the capabilities and boundaries of this model. The research materials included corpuses of national folklore traditions, legal documents, literary and theological works, and scientific (mainly religious) studies. The methodological framework was formed by the approach of N. Luhmann, who defined religion as a variety of forms of the universal anthropological phenomenon of observing of the unknown. Distinguishing descriptions of the first (naive), second (expert) and third (philosophical-synthetic) order, represented by the corresponding languages L1, L2 and L3, allowed to identify the terms traditionally related to the sphere of religion (L1) and to trace their descriptions (L2) and reflection in L1 and L2 within the framework of philosophical and theological writings (L3). As a result, several historically specific interpretations of the concept and the denotations behind it have been identified. They include both universal similarity and local features determined by the historical development of Russian and Chinese societies. For Russia, these features are inextricably linked with the influence of Christianity, where a distinction is made between elitist theological forms and mass believes, often referred to as superstitions. The main lexemes marking the miraculous in Chinese are 奇迹 (qíjì), reflecting the phenomenon of the amazing, surprising; 神迹 (shénjì), applied to the miraculous, God-like, spiritual, but not witches or sorcerers; 妙 (miào) as an aesthetic perception of a miracle, including an incomprehensible mystery; 灵 (líng) marks the supernatural, emanating from the earthly principle yin, therefore associated with folk witchcraft and sorcery. It has been established that in both Russian and Chinese culture, miracle is always combined with a certain worldview (L1), with a complex of ontological statements (L2). Experts (L3) typically turn to the prism of religious disciplines and/or teachings that analyze the correspondence of worldview, ontological constructs and lived religious experience. The sketch of the universal semantic field that makes up the intersecting concepts of Russian and Chinese cultures, obtained as a result of the research, needs further clarification by turning to the sociology of religion and the psychology of religion.

Publisher

MGIMO University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Arinin, E. I. and Liu, K. (2022) ‘Concepts of God in the Context of Chinese and Russian Culture: Comparative Religious Analysis (part 1)’, Vestnik Vladimirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Aleksandra Grigorʹeviča i Nikolaâ Grigorʹeviča Stoletovyh. Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye nauki, (3), pp. 70–77. (In Russian).

2. Arinin, E. I., Pavlov, M. S. and Liu, K. (2023) ‘Concepts of God in the Context of Chinese and Russian Culture: Comparative Religious Analysis (part 2)’, Vestnik Vladimirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Aleksandra Grigorʹeviča i Nikolaâ Grigorʹeviča Stoletovyh. Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye nauki, (1), pp. 71–79. (In Russian).

3. Astapov, S. N. (2017) ‘Veracity of a Miracle: Difficulties of the Approach of Evidentialism’, Voprosy filosofii, (9), pp. 121–130. (In Russian).

4. Chen, Y. and Fomina, M. N. (2022) ‘Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity’, Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 6(3), pp. 7–21. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2022-3-23-7-21

5. Filonov, S. V. and Li, X. (2018) ‘Formation and Current State of Religious Studies in China (in Assessments from Outside and from Within)’, Study of religion, (1), pp. 126–143. (In Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3