Affiliation:
1. Voronezh State University
Abstract
The relevance of collective memory analysis comes from the increasing role of memorization in social processes, which are currently acquiring increasingly significant conflict potential. The author analyses visual material of the popular science fiction series The Orville, which represents a segment of American political culture, as one of the cultural mechanisms for the assimilation of ideology and politics in mass cultural discourse. It is presumed that The Orville parodies the classic epics Star Trek and Babylon 5 and thus is part of the processes of deconstructing the historical collective memory of modern American society. This study intends to establish how a formally parody series not only mocks and imitates, but also constructs its own versions of memorial culture. The article aims: 1) to describe the universal tactics of deconstruction as a form of revision of existing memorial cultures; 2) to clarify the possibilities and boundaries of describing memorial culture through the prism of visual mass culture, using the example of a science fiction series; 3) to analyze the modes of updating political and social contradictions in American society on the example of the TV series The Orville; 4) to consider the specificity of the transformation of mass consciousness by constructing a new version of identity in the light of a radical revision of the narratives of classic science fiction series; 5) to analyze the political and ideological dimensions of the memory wars presented in the clash of traditional and liberal values of the characters in the series. Methodology of the article bases on the principles of the memorial turn and the analysis of the politics of memory within the paradigm of cultural and intellectual history and includes the methods of discourse analysis and intent analysis. The novelty of the study lies in determining the directions and specificities of the assimilation of the political, limited by the problems of collective memory, cultural, religious and gender identity along with military and ideological confrontation in modern mass culture of historical memory within the visual space of the science fiction series The Orville. The series is analyzed as an attempt to deconstruct the cultural experience and legacy of Star Trek, which actualized science fiction series as one of the sources of cultural and social meanings for modern consumer society. The author also analyzes the contribution of the series to the development of the collective memory of US society; the transformation of the concepts of Self and Otherness through the prism of specifying cultural, religious and gender roles. Revision of the past in popular culture as an alternative space for the functioning of collective historical memory is investigated. As a result of the study, it is presumed that The Orville actualizes modern American laughter culture and inspires attempts to rethink collective memory, the collective historical experience of trauma and represents an attempt to abandon the strategies of historical amnesia and ignoring politically inconvenient experiences.
Reference31 articles.
1. Adorno, T. (2005) ‘The Meaning of Working Through the Past’, in Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 89–103.
2. Aguiar, D. and Rojas, G. (2020) ‘O movimento feminista e de mulheres na Argentina: perspectivas pós-colonial e socialista’, Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, (121), pp. 169–190. https://doi.org/10.4000/ rccs.10436
3. Assmann, A. (2008) ‘Transformations between History and Memory’, Social Research: An International Quarterly, 75(1), pp. 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2008.0038
4. Berry, M. R. (2021) ‘Darulioian Assault: The Orville and Sexual Consent’, in Exploring The Orville: Essays on Seth MacFarlane’s Space Adventure. New York: McFarland, pp. 48–61.
5. Fairchild, L. (2021) ‘Toward a Queer Utopia: Alien Alterity and Sexuality in The Orville’, in Exploring The Orville: Essays on Seth MacFarlane’s Space Adventure. New York: McFarland, pp. 62–74.