Russia’s Sovereignty and Emergence of Pragmatic Polycentrism

Author:

Zemánek Ladislav1

Affiliation:

1. Charles University

Abstract

The article researches Russia’s concept of comprehensive sovereignty that is a cornerstone of the official state paradigm. Sovereignty is analyzed in its internal as well as external dimension, both synchronically and diachronically. The concept is interconnected with national security expanding into different realms. Sovereignty-based securitization tendencies are examined through methods of discursive analysis based upon constructivist assumptions. The present study puts emphasis on conceptual constructions and discursive practices significantly affecting individual perceptions, interpretation and Weltanschauung of political leadership as a whole, thereby shaping behavior, strategies and policies of individual actors concerned. The analysis reveals an affinity between concepts and discursive practices of the actors included in the research – Russia, the United States, China, and the European Union. It manifests itself in the concepts of comprehensive sovereignty, America First, dual circulation, and strategic autonomy respectively. These strategies are examined in relation to the transformation of the global order from US-led hegemonism towards polycentrism. The author draws attention to the interactions within the “quadrilateral” consisting of Russia, China, the EU and the US in order to demonstrate the emergence and dynamics of autonomization or regionalization, which is to be regarded as a dialectical moment in the globalization process towards glocalization and pragmatic polycentrism. The author concludes that the EU’s strategic autonomy is a positive feature, but requires the abandonment of Euro-Atlanticism, which thwarts restructuring the Eurasian macroregion in general, and settling Russia-Europe relations in particular.

Publisher

MGIMO University

Reference30 articles.

1. Brands, H. (2021). The Emerging Biden Doctrine: Democracy, Autocracy, and the Defining Clash of Our Time. Foreign Affairs, June 29. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-06-29/emerging-biden-doctrine (accessed: 14.01.2022)

2. Bratersky, M. (2014). Transformation of Russia’s Foreign Policy. Russia in Global Affairs, 12(2), 54– 62.

3. Diesen, G. (2021). Russian Conservatism: Managing Change under Permanent Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield.

4. Fischer, S., & Timofeev, I. (2020). Alternative futures of EU-Russia relations in 2030. EUREN, November. URL: https://eu-russia-expertnetwork.eu/en/sabine-fischer-ivan-timofeev-alternative-futures-of-eu-russia-relations-in-2030/ (accessed: 14.01.2022)

5. Gvozdev, N. K., & Marsh, C. (2014). Russian Foreign Policy: Interests, Vectors, and Sectors. CQ Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3