Implementation of the Principle of Mutual Trust in the Migration Cases by the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights

Author:

Tsveiba N. А.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MGIMO-University

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines the positive and negative aspects of the application of the «principle of mutual trust» within the framework of European Union law. The positive features of the application of the «principle of mutual trust» include simplification of procedural aspects of the application of the law, strengthening of interaction between member states of the European Union, as well as harmonization of legislation. At the same time, the application of this principle by EU member states with low standards of human rights protection leads to their violation. The author's research shows that the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, criticizing the negative aspects of the «principle of mutual trust»,v led to its evolution and strengthened the level of protection of the rights and freedoms of European union’s citizens as well as it strengthened the interaction between the EU Court and the ECHR.Materials and methods. The methodological ground of the study based on the following general scientific and special methods of the recognition of legal phenomena and processes in the field of European law: the method of system-structural analysis, the method of synthesis of social phenomena, the comparative legal method, the formal logical method. For certain questions, statistical data was involved in the study. To identify further vectors for the development of interaction between judicial bodies used the content analysis.Results of the study. Based on the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that the evolution in the interaction of the two judicial institutions in the field of protection of the rights and freedoms of migrants and the rethinking of the principle of mutual trust are caused by the relaunching of the dialogue on the accession of the European Union to the European Convention of fundamental rights 1950 and by the deep awareness of the high significance of such accession for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe.Discussion and conclusions. The principle of mutual trust is still a key point in building a trustful relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. Currently, these judicial bodies have reached the highest level of convergence, which can be seen in the analysis of law enforcement practice.

Publisher

MGIMO University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Abashidze A.H. Alisievich E.C., 2017. Evropejskaja sistema zashhity prav cheloveka [The European human rights system].

2. Abashidze A.H., 2023. Zashhita prav cheloveka v ESPCh: prakticheskoe posobie. [The human rights protection in ECHR: practical textbook].

3. Abdullin A.I., Bezborodov U.S., 2023. Evropejskoe pravo [The European law].

4. Birjukov M.M., Aliev D.M., 2018. Dublinskoe regulirovanie: istorija stanovlenija i soderzhanie. [Dublin regulation: history of formation and content] – Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. № 2.

5. Birjukov M.M., 2013. Evropejskoe pravo do i posle Lissabonskogo dogovora [European law before and after the Treaty of Lisboan].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3