Affiliation:
1. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Abstract
Introduction.The article gives an overviewofintegrationassociations’policyforsmartcitydevelopment.Theexistingratesofurbanizationandthegrowthoftheeconomicweightofcitiesgiverisetonewchallenges and opportunities, which for the developed integration associations can no longer be considered exclusively at local or national levels. Consequently, there is a growing demand from integration associations for the formation of common approaches to smart city management. The authors examine the efforts of the European Union and the Association of South East Asian Nations undertaken for the development of smart cities and give recommendations for the Eurasian Economic Union.Materialsandmethods.The methodological basis of the study includes the following general scientific methods of cognition of processes and phenomena: an analytical approach, qualitative analysis and comparative analysis. The examined materials include official documents of integration associations,analyticalreportsofinternationalorganizationsandstudiesofdomesticandforeignscientists.Thechoiceoftheresearchtopicisjustifiedbytheurbanizationrateswiththeincreasingimportanceofpublicmanagementqualityanddraftingofa long-term agenda for the development of agglomerations. Smart cities become interested in managerial cooperation with other cities, harmonization of approaches and exchange of best practices. The universal theory of smart cities is to yet formed, but in real life, efforts are already being made to develop a common knowledge and experience base: smart cities create platforms for interaction, sign agreements, draw ratings and develop management and technical standards. Some integration groups already began to single out smart cities as a separate area of their activity. We can forecast that the topic of smart cities will become the key one for all integration associations, including EAEU. For Russia, as for a country that is currently developing its own standards for managing smart cities, this issue is of fundamental importance: cooperation with the countries of the Union can serve as an additional source of knowledge and experience and will create strategic opportunities and advantages for the domestic IT industry.Results.TheEuropeanUnionandtheAssociationofSouthEastAsianNationswerethefirsttoputtheissueofsmartcitydevelopmentontheagenda.Meanwhile,theseorganizationshavetakentwodifferentpaths:theEUissimultaneouslyworkingona whole set of initiatives to develop common approaches and standards for smart city approaches and standards. ASEAN is so far limited to having a platform for financial and informational assistance to particular cities.Discussionand conclusions.Withinthe formation of the common digital space for the EAEU, the issue of joint development of smart cities should be included into the integration agenda. The experience of the EU and ASEAN may be useful for the Eurasian Economic Union, whose interest in smart cities is just beginning to emerge. The simultaneous creation of a platform of smart cities and the development of common standards could become a positive step in this field.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献