Abstract
Price gouging occurs when, in the wake of an emergency, sellers of a certain necessary goods sharply raise their prices beyond the level needed to cover increased costs. Most people think that price gouging is immoral, and most states have laws rendering the practice a civil or criminal offense. The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the philosophic issues surrounding price gouging, and to argue that the common moral condemnation of it is largely mistaken. I will make this argument in three steps, by rebutting three widely held beliefs about the ethics of price gouging: 1) that laws prohibiting price gouging are morally justified, 2) that price gouging is morally impermissible behavior, even if it ought not be illegal, and 3) that price gouging reflects poorly on the moral character of those who engage in it, even if the act itself is not morally impermissible.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. Coercive wage offers;Zimmerman;Philosophy and Public Affairs,,1981
2. Sowell T. 2004. “Price gouging” in Florida. Jewish World Review, September 28. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell091404.asp.
3. Sweatshops: Kant and Consequences
4. MARKETS AS ECONOMIZERS OF INFORMATION: EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF THE “HAYEK HYPOTHESIS”
Cited by
123 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献