Abstract
Abstract:What does socially responsible investing (SRI) accomplish for investors and for society? Proponents of SRI claim that the practice yields competitive portfolio returns for investors, while at the same time achieving better outcomes for society at large. Skeptics view SRI as ineffective at best and ill-conceived marketing hype at worst. My objective in this paper is to apply mainstream finance research findings to the question of whether SRI may be expected to lead to superior social outcomes. I conclude that under the perfect markets assumptions underlying most finance theory, SRI will not affect social outcomes. However, given well documented imperfections in equity markets, the claim that SRI “makes a difference” to society is a reasonable one that is consistent with current theoretical and empirical research in finance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference37 articles.
1. Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A Theoretical Perspective
2. The Upstairs Market for Large-Block Transactions: Analysis and Measurement of Price Effects
3. Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?
4. Ewing Terzah . 2000. “Remaking Russell Shakes Up Small Stocks.” The Wall Street Journal, June 26: C1.
5. diBartolomeo Dan , and Kurtz Lloyd . 2000. “Managing Risk Exposures of Socially Screened Portfolios.” Working Paper, Northfield Information Services, Boston, Mass.
Cited by
75 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献