Abstract
Firms possessing a unique competency to rescue the victims of a human catastrophe have a minimum moral obligation to devote substantial resources toward best efforts to aid the victims. The minimum amount that firms should devote to rescue is the largest sum of their most recent year’s investment in social initiatives, their five-year trend, their industry’s average, or the national average. Financial exigency may justify a lower level of investment. Alternative social investments may be continued if they have an equally compelling rationale. These duties apply to the global pharmaceutical companies in the context of the AIDS pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Should YouTube make recommendations for the climate?;Ethics and Information Technology;2024-08-10
2. Excusing Corporate Wrongdoing and the State of Nature;Academy of Management Review;2024-02-08
3. Corporate Citizenship and Community Stakeholders;R. Edward Freeman’s Selected Works on Stakeholder Theory and Business Ethics;2023
4. Corporations and Duties to the Global Poor;Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics;2023
5. Corporations and Duties to the Global Poor;Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics;2023