Transactional Analysis in Scientific Research – Key Question-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Transactional Analysis in Scientific Research – Key Question

Published:2022-01-31 Issue:1 Volume:1 Page:12-19
ISSN:2782-4349
Container-title:Transactional Analysis in Russia
language:
Short-container-title:Transactional Analysis in Russia

Author:

Savina M. A.^ORCID,Leonov E. V.^ORCID

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of scientific research of transactional analysis. A brief overview of the problem of relevance is given. We carry out a review of modern literary sources on this topic. We criticize scientific research methods such as double-blind controlled research in relation to psychotherapy. It is shown how the process of accumulating knowledge affects the theory of transactional analysis itself, including through integration with other therapeutic schools. The prospects and goals of the modern scientific study of transactional analysis are outlined.

Publisher

MIR-TA

Reference31 articles.

1. Лаутербах В. (1995). Эффективность психотерапии: критерии и результаты оценки. Психотерапия: от теории к практике. Материалы I съезда Российской Психотерапевтической Ассоциации. СПб., изд. Психоневрологического института им. В. М. Бехтерева, С. 2841;

2. Шюлер П. (2000). Современное состояния психотерапии в западных странах. СПЖ, №12, стр. 28-30;

3. Berne, Eric (1973). What Do You Say After You Say Hello?;

4. Boholst, F. A. (2002). A Life Position Scale. Transactional Analysis Journal, 32(1), 28–32;

5. Christopher, J. C., & Richardson, F. C. (2000,). «Philosophical hermeneutics: A metatheory to transcend dualism and individualism in Western psychology» in Smith K. D.(Chair), Metatheories in the natural sciences and in cross-cultural psychology. Symposium conducted at the International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychologists, Warsaw, Poland;