Abstract
By noting the absence of the interaction between historical and literary analysis in the exegesis of the Johannine Son of Man, this study proposes prioritizing synchronic approach. When the methodological weaknesses of the historical-critical analysis in reaching a consistent explanation of the Johannine Son of Man is highlighted, its tendency to seek a common denominator within the complex Son of Man debate is noted. Along those lines, it is suggested that the Gospel narrative should take over that role. After considering the hermeneutical implications of such a move, the example of verse 1,51 is presented as a case study.
Reference62 articles.
1. Abrams, Meyer H. 1971 [1941]. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Reinhart and Winston.
2. Ashton, John. 2011. The Johannine Son of Man: A New Proposal. New Testament Studies 57:508–529.
3. Borgen, Peder. 1977. Some Jewish Exegetical Traditions as Background for Son of Man Sayings in John’s Gospel (Jn 3:13-14 and context). In: Martin De Jonge, ed. L’Evangile de Jean: Sources, rédaction, theologie, 243–258. Louvain: University Press; Gembloux: Duculot.
4. Bousset, Wilhelm. 1970. Kyrios Christos: A History of the Belief in Christ from the Beginnings of Christianity to Irenaeus. Nashville: Abingdon.
5. Brown, Raymond E. 1966. The Gospel According to John I‒XII. Garden City: Doubleday.