Abstract
Aim: To assess the effect of different mechanical surface treatments on flexural strength of repaired denture base. Material and Methods: Sixty bar-shaped specimens of heat-polymerized acrylic resin were fabricated, and divided into six groups (n=10). All specimens, except the positive control group (group PC), were sectioned into halves to create a 1-mm clearance. A negative control group with no surface treatment (group NC) was also considered. Other groups underwent different surface treatments: group Laser; treated with erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, group APA; airborne-particle abrasion (APA), group APA plus Laser; a combination of laser and APA, and group Bur; bur grinding. After measuring surface roughness (Ra) with a profilometer, all sectioned specimens were repaired by auto-polymerizing acrylic resin, and thermocycled afterward. Three-point bending test was performed by a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed (α=0.05). Results: The mean surface roughness of all experimental groups were significantly higher than that of group NC (pandlt;0.05). The mean flexural strength of all groups was significantly lower than that of group PC (pandlt;0.05). Group B had significantly higher flexural strength than the other surface-treated groups (pandlt;0.05). Group Laser had significantly higher flexural strength than groups APA (p=0.043) and APA plus Laser (p=0.023). No significant difference was found between groups APA and APA plus Laser (p=0.684). Conclusion: All surface treatments increased the surface roughness and flexural strength compared with the untreated group. The highest flexural strength was observed in specimens treated by bur grinding and then laser, however, it was still significantly lower than intact specimens.
Publisher
Facultad de Odontologia, Universidad de Concepcion
Reference28 articles.
1. Pić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):524-8.
2. AlQahtani M, Haralur SB. Influence of different repair acrylic resin and thermocycling on the flexural strength of denture base resin. Medicina. 2020;56(2):50-9.
3. Asli HN, Hemmati YB, Ghaffari M, Falahchai M. Satis-faction of patients with mandibular implant-supported overdentures using a generalized estimating equation model: A prospective study. J Osseointegration. 2021.
4. Sari F, Ustun O, Kirmali O. Efficacy of various pretreat-ments on the bond strength of denture teeth to denture base resins. Photomed laser surg. 2018;36(4):214-20.
5. Andrade de Freitas SL, Brandt WC, Miranda ME, Vitti RP. Effect of thermocycling, teeth, and polymerization methods on bond strength teeth-denture base. Int J Dent. 2018.