Teacher Evaluation, Ambitious Mathematics Instruction, and Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Evidence from Early-Career Teachers

Author:

Kim Jihyun1,Frank Kenneth2,Youngs Peter3,Salloum Serena4,Bieda Kristen2

Affiliation:

1. Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul, South Korea

2. Michigan State University

3. University of Virginia

4. Ball State University

Abstract

Teacher evaluation policies have been central to policy efforts to enhance teaching quality. At the same time, ambitious mathematics instruction has been emphasized by teacher education programs as well as by the Common Core State Standards. Drawing on observation and survey data from early-career teachers, this study examines how teachers’ perceived pressure of teacher evaluation policies shape their ambitious mathematics instruction. We found that teachers who perceived a strong pressure of teacher evaluation on their instructional practices tended to move further away from enacting ambitious mathematics instruction. Moreover, the negative association between the pressure of teacher evaluation and ambitious instruction was stronger for teachers with a high level of mathematical knowledge for teaching.

Publisher

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics

Subject

Education,Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Attending to Coherence Among Research Questions, Methods, and Claims in Coding Studies;Journal for Research in Mathematics Education;2024-05

2. The Influence of a University-School Partnership on Pre-service Teachers’ Perceived Preparedness and Views on Teaching and Learning S.T.E.M;International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education;2024-04-09

3. Preparing Elementary Preservice Teachers for Inquiry-Based Science and Mathematics Instruction Through a Novel Initiative;Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education;2023-12

4. Stewarding Our Commons for the Infinite Game of Research;Journal for Research in Mathematics Education;2023-07

5. What the Current Editorial Team Values in Reviews for JRME;Journal for Research in Mathematics Education;2022-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3