Author:
Lee Mun Wai,Cheong Fook Meng,Yeo Kim Chuan
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes of patients implanted with the Clareon® monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with AutonoMe™, an automated disposable preloaded delivery device.Design: Retrospective review.Methods: One hundred and eight eyes of 88 patients underwent uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery and implantation with the Clareon IOL. The primary endpoints were best-corrected distance acuity (BCDA), uncorrected distance acuity (UCDA), and proportion of patients achieving UCDA of logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) 0.18 or better at 1 month. Secondary endpoints included refractive stability and predictability, contrast sensitivity as well as wound stretch and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA).Results: The mean BCDA and UCDA at 1 month were logMAR 0.06 ± 0.08 and 0.18 ± 0.17, respectively. 93.8% of eyes had BCDA of logMAR 0.18 or better, and all eyes had BCDA of logMAR 0.3 or better. 80.9% of eyes had UCDA of 0.18 or better, and 97.8% of eyes had UCDA of 0.3 or better. All eyes were within 0.75 D of refractive target, 90.9% were within 0.5 D, and 68.7% were within 0.25 D. The mean contrast values (logMAR) were 1.73 ± 0.18 at 3 cpd, 1.91 ± 0.24 at 6 cpd, 1.62 ± 0.25 at 12 cpd, and 1.09 ± 0.28 at 18 cpd. Mean wound stretch and centroid SIA for a 2.2 mm incision was 0.04 ± 0.05 mm and 0.10 D, respectively. There was no wound stretch for a 2.4 mm incision and centroid SIA was 0.23 D.Conclusion: The Clareon IOL provided excellent visual outcomes and good refractive predictability. The AutonoMe delivery system did not cause significant corneal wound stretch or astigmatism.
Reference15 articles.
1. Negishi K, Masui S, Torii H, Nishi Y, Tsubota K. Refractive stability of a new single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens and corneal wound repair after implantation using a new automated intraocular lens delivery system. PloS One. 2020;15:e0238366.
2. Werner L, Ellis N, Heczko JB, et al. In vivo evaluation of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in the rabbit model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:1497–1502.
3. Bilbao A, Quintana JM, Escobar A, Garcia S, Andradas E, Bare M, Elizalde B. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the VF-14 index, SF-36, and visual acuity in patients undergoing cataract surgery; for the IRYSS-Cataract Group. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:418–424.e1.
4. Werner L, Thatthamla I, Ong M, et al. Evaluation of clarity characteristics in a new hydrophobic acrylic IOL in comparison with commercially available lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1490–1497.
5. Auffarth G, Schickhardt S, Wang Q, Fang H, Hengerer F. Optical purity evaluation and accelerated aging of the new Clareon biomaterial vs other hydrophobic acrylic material in a laboratory setup. Presented at the XXXV Congress of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS), Lisbon, Portugal, October 2017.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献