Enhanced landslide susceptibility prediction with 3D ALOS PALSAR imagery and neural networks: A data-efficient framework
Author:
ABUJAYYAB Sohaib K M1ORCID
Abstract
Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) founded on DEM is a growing research field with profound implications for human safety and infrastructure preservation. Many existing methods rely on extensive input data to enhance predictive accuracy. This paper aims to introduce a remote sensing-data-requirement framework for LSM. Our approach exclusively leverages a single ALOS PALSAR image, comprising three key steps: (1) Pre-processing, (2) derivation of explanatory variables, and (3) neural network modeling. To begin, we extracted 22 input variables from the ALOS PALSAR image. These variables played a pivotal role in developing the Neural Network (NN) predictor. The predictor structure consists of 22 variables in the input layer, 150 neurons in the hidden layer, and a single output layer. Our model was trained using 5,829 sample points, and subsequently, it was employed to generate landslide susceptibility (LS) map with 745,810 points. Based on the Overall accuracy metric, the model exhibited impressive performance accuracy, achieving 89.3% training and 82.3% testing accuracies. Additionally, it demonstrated a strong performance of 95.22% during training and 84.7% during testing according to the ROC curve. In conclusion, the implementation of our proposed method underscores its ability to develop remarkable accuracy model with remote sensing-data-requirement. This framework offers valuable insights for future progress in regions with challenging conditions and extensive data coverage. Moreover, it effectively handles data quality inconsistencies and data updating issues.
Publisher
Marmara University
Reference18 articles.
1. Adel, K., Katlane, R., Haddad, R., & Rabia, M. C. (2023). Landslide susceptibility mapping by Frequency Ratio and Fuzzy logic approach: A case study of Mogods and Hedil (Northern Tunisia). 2. Arca, D., Keskin Citiroglu, H., & Tasoglu, I. K. (2019). A comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility
assessment of the Satuk village (Yenice, NW Turkey) by frequency ratio and multi-criteria decision methods.
Environmental Earth Sciences, 78(81), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8094-6 3. Çan, T., Duman, T. Y., Olgun, Ş., Çörekçioğlu, Ş., Karakaya-Gülmez, F., Elmacı, H., Hamzaçebi, S., & Emre, Ö.
(2013). Türkiye heyelan veri tabanı. TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi. 4. Chae, B.-G., Park, H.-J., Catani, F., Simoni, A., & Berti, M. (2017). Landslide prediction, monitoring and early
warning: A concise review of state-of-the-art. Geosciences Journal, 21(6), 1033–1070.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0034-4 5. Chaudhary, P., Chhetri, S. K., Joshi, K. M., Shrestha, B. M., & Kayastha, P. (2015). Application of an Analytic
Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the GIS interface for suitable fire site selection: A case study from Kathmandu
Metropolitan City, Nepal. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2015.10.001
|
|