Affiliation:
1. University of Brighton, UNITED KINGDOM
2. Institute of Development Studies, UNITED KINGDOM
Abstract
Queer and feminist visual activism has various origins across the globe and has emerged in a fluid cultural field of visual arts, popular culture, and protest aesthetics. Given the current context of gender backlash, these forms of activism have become urgent, and so too has scholarship that engages with global queer and feminist visual activism. In this special issue, we engage with the richness of activist aesthetics at the intersections of popular culture, subculture, art and activism, and other forms of visual political communication, not by attempting to contain these manifestations, but by offering a set of navigational tools. We conceive of three primary forms of queer and feminist visual practice – protest, process and product – each with its own histories and epistemologies. Each of these forms offers the capacity for resistance and collaboration. By opening up cross- and inter-disciplinary perspectives, and conversations across diverse global contexts, struggles and possibilities, we aim to expand on existing scholarship both geographically and conceptually. A central motivation for this work has been to think beyond the image; to be able to capture and engage with the activist communities (and the activism) behind and alongside the image and produced through the image. Taking the notion of social practice as an integral part of the ‘process’ of visual activism, we identify three emerging themes across the articles in this special issue: refusal, care, and thriving.
Reference119 articles.
1. ACT UP New York: Activism, Art, and the AIDS Crisis, 1987–1993. (n.d.). Carpenter Center for Visual Arts. Available at: https://carpenter.center/program/act-up-new-york-activism-art-and-the-aids-crisis-1987-1993i (Accessed: 7 December 2022).
2. Aiello, G. and Parry, K. (2020). Visual Communication: Understanding Images in Media Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529721522
3. Andreasen, M. B. (2021). ‘Rapeable’ and ‘unrapeable’ women: The portrayal of sexual violence in Internet memes about #MeToo. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1833185
4. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Baker, J. E., Clancy, K. A. and Clancy, B. (2020). Putin as gay icon? Memes as a tactic in Russian LGBT+ activism, in R. Buyantueva and M. Shevtsova (eds), LGBTQ+ activism in central and eastern Europe (pp. 209–233). London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20401-3_9