A comparison of institutional quality in the South Caucasus

Author:

Niftiyev Ibrahim1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Szeged

Abstract

Much has happened in the three countries of the South Caucasus-namely, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Armenia-since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Political events, institutional reforms, and economic development have resulted in greater economic welfare in these countries after the painful transition period of the 1990s. However, it remains to be seen whether they have achieved any solid results or whether they still have much to accomplish. While the answer is ambiguous, each country has followed a different political, geopolitical, economic, and institutional path and achieved different economic outcomes despite their close geographical proximity to each other. This paper compares the available data on economic and institutional quality in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Armenia to portray the overall situation in terms of changes in institutional patterns. Then, special attention is given to Azerbaijan, as the country is considered to be oil-rich and thus resource-dependent. A comparative perspective on institutional quality suggests that Georgia has been a leading country in terms of institutions and effective bureaucracy-building, despite having lower economic indicators compared to Azerbaijan. Moreover, while Armenia is positioned between Georgia and Azerbaijan in terms of institutional quality, its economic growth is similar to Georgia's. Lastly, institutional variables (e.g., control of corruption, rule of law, and government effectiveness, and human rights) in Azerbaijan are negatively correlated with oil-related variables. This result aligns with the natural resource curse and Dutch disease theories, which posit that oil boom periods in mineral-rich countries are associated with a deterioration in institutional quality, thereby leading to slower growth. Also, the results are important to build up analytical frameworks to address the Dutch disease or resource curse studies in the case of Azerbaijan in a comparative manner with oil-poor countries even if the scope is limited to the South Caucasian former Soviet Union countries.

Publisher

Szegedi Tudományegyetem Gazdaságtudományi Kar

Reference75 articles.

1. Ahmadov, I .- Mammadov, J. - Aslanli, K. (2013): Assessment of Institutional Quality in Resource-Rich Caspian Basin Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2274813

2. Alieva, L. (2000): Reshaping Eurasia: Foreign Policy Strategies and Leadership Assets in Post-Soviet South Caucasus. Berkeley Program in Soviet and PostSoviet Studies Working Paper Series, University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies.

3. Aliyev, H. (2014): The Effects of the Saakashvili Era Reforms on Informal Practices in the Republic of Georgia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 6, 1, 19- 33.

4. Aliyev, H. (2015a): Institutional Transformation and Informality in Azerbaijan and Georgia. In J. Morris and A. Polese (Eds.), Informal Economies in PostSocialist Spaces: Practices, Institutions and Networks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 51-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483072_3

5. Aliyev, H. (2015b): South Caucasus's Kinship Networks as Obstacles to Civil Participation, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 14, 2, 263-282.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3