Abstract
Eleven samples of registered wheat varieties of bread with diverse technological qualities were used in this study. The samples were devided into two groups. The first group including all the 11 variety were stored for 3 months, while the second group of the samples were stored for 9 months at an ambient temperature. The results of quality evaluation showed that 5 soft wheat varieties (GK Csongrád, GK Garaboly, GK Hattyú, GK Holló, GK Nap) and 6 hard wheat varieties (GK Ati, GK Békés, GK Élet, GK Kalász, GK Petúr, GK Verecke) were involved in the study. Further, the flour yield, the gluten index and the water absorbance capacity has significantly decreased after 9 months storage time when compared to 3 months storage interval.
Reference22 articles.
1. PENA RJ Wheat quality for bread food needs (1997): In Nagarajan S, Singh G and Tyagi BS (eds) Proceedings of International meeting on “Wheat research needs beyond 2000AD”, Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal, India 28:303-31
2. MATSUO RR, DEXTER JE, KOSMOLAK FG AND LIESLE D (1982): Statistical evaluation of tests for assessing spaghetti-making quality of durum wheat. Cereal Chem 59:222-228.
3. VÉHA A. (2007): Correlation between the kernel structure and the quality parameters on some Hungarian winter wheat varieties, Cereal Research Communications, Volume 35, Number 2, DOI 10.1556/CRC.35.
4. KÖRMÖCZI P., B. TÓTH, A. NAGY-GYÖRGY, K. KOCSIS, J. ÓVÁRI, B. P. SZABÓ, A. VÉHA and L. CSEUZ (2019): SNP-based Genetic Diversity Assessment among Hungarian Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes, CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 48, 1–7 (2020), ISSN 0133-3720, DOI 10.1007/s42976-019-00005-z
5. SZABÓ, P. B. (2017). Connection Between the Debranning Time and the Kernel Hardness of Wheat. Analecta Technica Szegedinensia, 11(1), 16-22.