Leadership Styles and Power Bases Preferences of Primary School Administrators from the Perspective of Preservice Science Teachers

Author:

ŞAHİNGÖZ Selçuk1

Affiliation:

1. KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the types of leadership that primary school administrators exhibit and the power bases they utilize from the perspective of preservice science teachers. Design/Methodology/Approach: Qualitative research design was applied in the study. The data were collected through the observations through 72 preservice science teachers during the Fall and Spring semesters and the assessment of the self-reports they prepared based on the semi-structured interviews with 18 school administrators. Findings: According to the obtained data from the preservice science teachers, leadership style preferences of school principals are more in favor of instructional and moral leadership styles. The result is similar for school vice principals, but shared leadership style is also added to the mentioned leadership styles. The findings also show that the school administrators use legitimate and expert power bases more than the other power bases in educational administration process. Highlights: The preservice science teachers additionally emphasized the school principals are greatly benefit from their charisma power on the contrary the school vice principals. On the other hand, they pointed out the school vice principals exhibit shared leadership more than the school principals. Last, the preservice teachers argued leadership preferences of the school administrators that aspect of science education related practices.

Publisher

Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi

Subject

General Medicine

Reference6 articles.

1. Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1996). Bases of power in relation to leader behavior: A field investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7(1): 3-21.

2. Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin kullandıkları güç kaynakları ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu arasındaki ilişki. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(2), 385-402.

3. Aslanargun, E. (2011). The Power Sources that Principals Handle in School Administration. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 3-28.

4. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.

5. Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Management: The new competitive landscape. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3