Association of Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid With Umbilical Cord Arterial Blood Gas Parameters and Apgar Score: A Brief Report

Author:

Nouri Behnaz1ORCID,Niazadeh Fahimeh2ORCID,Pooransari Parichehr3ORCID,Arab Maliheh4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Preventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

2. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shohaday-e Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4. Department of Gyneco-Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objectives: Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) increases the risk of morbidity and mortality of neonates. Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) can end in hypoxemia, hypercarbia, and acidosis. The aim of this study was to compare the results of umbilical cord arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis and Apgar score of the neonates with and without MSAF. Materials and Methods: Of all women (N=2037) who gave birth by caesarean section at Shohadaye-Tajrish hospital from 2015 to 2018, 100 women with MSAF were considered as the case group and 100 with normal amniotic fluid as the control group. The gestational age (GA) at caesarean delivery, neonate’s gender, 1 and 5 minutes Apgar scores (AS), and results of umbilical cord ABG analysis were compared between the groups using chi-square and t test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24.0. Results: The case group had a higher mean GA (39.19±1.52 weeks vs. 38.57±0.671; P<0.001) and the control group had a higher mean 1-minute AS (9.58±0.25 vs. 8.47±0.327; P<0.001), while the distribution of the neonate’s gender and frequency of low/normal 5-minute AS were not different between the groups (P>0.05). The control group had a higher mean pressure of oxygen (32.44±24.89 vs. 25.83±16.63; P=0.029); other parameters were not different between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The lower pressure of oxygen in neonates with MSAF, despite no difference in acidosis suggest that various factors have to be considered in order to differentiate pathologic and physiologic MSAF.

Publisher

International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3