Comparison of Laparoscopic Myomectomy Outcomes Based on Myoma Weight: A Cross-sectional Study

Author:

Akbari Elham1,Sarbazi Fereshteh1,Karimi Anita1,Nouri Behnaz2,Noori Ardebili Shahla1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Farmanieh Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objectives: Myomas are the most common non-malignant pelvic neoplasm in women’s reproductive life. The aim of present study was to compare the outcome of large myoma Laparoscopy in Iranian reproductive-age women. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 women with symptomatic uterine myoma who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy between December 2013 and October 2018. Participants were divided into two groups based on the myoma weight (<80 (n=15) and ≥80 g (n=71)). Finally, age, body mass index, number of myomas removed, duration of surgery, postoperative hospitalization, amount of blood transfusion, and hemoglobin reduction were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Results: The mean age of participants were similar in both groups (P=0.48). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding body mass index (P=0.56) and indications for laparoscopic myomectomy (P=0.46). The mean weight of myoma and duration of surgery were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001 and P<0.007, respectively). Changes in hemoglobin and days of hospitalization after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The length of hospital stay and blood loss in laparoscopic myomectomy did not differ significantly based on myoma weight. So, laparoscopic myomectomy could be considered a minimally invasive alternative for managing symptomatic large myoma.

Publisher

International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3