Affiliation:
1. Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law , Tel Aviv 6997801 Israel
Abstract
Abstract
Litigants settle in the shadow of the law, but they behave in the shadow of the settlement outcome. Disparities in bargaining power drive a wedge between the shadow of the settlement and the shadow of the law. Broad literature has recognized various problems that stem from this discrepancy, from suboptimal deterrence to distributive concerns. We offer a new perspective to address these concerns—regulating the settlement process, through a judge-induced bargaining protocol. We develop this argument through a bargaining protocol that assigns a take-it-or-leave-it offer to one of the parties and discuss the policy goals that such protocol could advance.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference69 articles.
1. Hobbes, Formalism, and Corrective Justice;Allen;Iowa Law Rev.,1992
2. Costly Pretrial Agreements;Anderlini;J. Legal Stud.,2019
3. Improving Settlement Devices: Rule 68 and Beyond;Anderson;J. Legal Stud.,1994
4. Revisiting the Roles of Legal Rules and Tax Rules in Income Redistribution: A Response to Kaplow & Shavell;Avraham;Iowa Law Rev.,2004
5. Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information;Bebchuk;Rand J. Econ.,1984
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献