Effects of probiotic supplementation in adult with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Author:

Husein-ElAhmed Husein12,Steinhoff Martin23456

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hospital de Baza , Granada , Spain

2. Translational Research Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation , Doha , Qatar

3. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hamad Medical Corporation , Doha , Qatar

4. Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, College of Medicine , Doha , Qatar

5. Qatar University, Medical School , Doha , Qatar

6. Department of Dermatology , Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases. The effect of probiotic administration on the severity of AD in adults has shown inconsistent results. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation as a therapeutic tool for adult AD. Methods PubMed, Scopus and Embase were systematically searched to collect data from studies in which probiotics were administered to treat adult AD. Results Out of 413 publications, 9 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Significant differences in the ScORing Atopic Dermatitis tool favouring probiotics were observed [relative risk (RR) –5.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) –8.43 to –3.43]. Lactobacillus salivarius presented with largest effect size (RR –9.79, 95% CI –13.04 to –6.54), followed by L. acidophilus (RR –5.77, 95% CI –10.82 to –0.72) and L. plantarum (RR –3.76, 95% CI –6.36 to –1.16). No benefit was observed with L. fermentum. Based on the severity of AD, probiotics showed better results in people with moderate-to-severe AD (RR –9.12, 95% CI –12.17 to –6.08) than in individuals with mild disease (RR –2.67, 95% CI –4.67 to –0.66). Serum levels of IgE and eosinophil count remained significantly unchanged after the probiotic intervention (RR 0.25, 95% CI –0.10 to 0.60; RR –0.27, 95% CI –0.68 to 0.13, respectively). Conclusions Current evidence supports a role for some probiotics as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of adult AD, particularly in patients with severe AD. The efficacy of probiotics is strain specific, with L. salivarius and L. acidophilus having the largest clinical benefit. Such benefit is apparently independent of IgE levels and eosinophil count. Despite these encouraging results, the decrease in AD severity did not translate into a clinically meaningful better quality of life as assessed by the Dermatology Life Quality Index. There currently is not enough reliable data to reach conclusions about the optimal dose and duration for probiotic treatment.

Funder

National Priorities Research Program

Qatar National Research Fund

Member of Qatar Foundation

Internal Research Grand Competition

MRC Fund

Hamad Medical Corporation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Dermatology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3