Parent satisfaction with lotion, cream, gel and ointment emollient types: secondary analysis of Best Emollients for Eczema study

Author:

Allen Olivia G E1,MacNeill Stephanie2,Ridd Matthew J1

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK

2. Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The main determinant of emollient effectiveness is whether it used, which in turn is linked with user satisfaction. Objectives To compare parental satisfaction with emollients for the treatment of childhood eczema. Methods Secondary analysis of data from the Best Emollients for Eczema (BEE) trial. 550 children aged between 6 months to 12 years were recruited from primary care in England and randomised to use a lotion, cream, gel or ointment as their main emollient for 16 weeks. At week 16 parents were asked to complete an emollient satisfaction questionnaire (ESQ). Completion rates and scores were compared, using chi-squared, t-test calculations, and one-way ANOVA as appropriate. Results Data on 378 participants (68.7% of those randomised) were analysed. Mean (SD) ESQ scores were gel 20.9 (5.3), lotion 20.4 (5.6), cream 18.8 (6.3) and ointment 15.2 (6.8) (p<0.0001). In pairwise comparisons, there was a statistically significant difference in mean ESQ scores between ointment and lotion (p<0.0001), ointment and cream (p<0.0001) and ointment and gel (p<0.0001) but not between lotion, cream, and gel. Participants using lotions had highest overall satisfaction and were most likely to continue using their emollient. ESQ scores were correlated with reported emollient use and improvements in parent-reported eczema severity. Conclusions Overall, lotions and gels were favoured over creams and ointments. Although satisfaction is determined by personal preference, these results will aid parents, clinicians, and children find the right emollient(s) for them.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Dermatology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3