Affiliation:
1. University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, I identify a theoretical and political role for ‘white ignorance’, present three alternative accounts of white ignorance, and assess how well each fulfils this role. On the Willful Ignorance View, white ignorance refers to white individuals’ willful ignorance about racial injustice. On the Cognitivist View, white ignorance refers to ignorance resulting from social practices that distribute faulty cognitive resources. On the Structuralist View, white ignorance refers to ignorance that (1) results as part of a social process that systematically gives rise to racial injustice, and (2) is an active player in the process. I argue that, because of its greater power and flexibility, the Structuralist View better explains the patterns of ignorance that we observe, better illuminates the connection to white racial domination, and is overall better suited to the project of ameliorating racial injustice. As such, the Structuralist View should be preferred.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference57 articles.
1. Epistemologies of Ignorance: Three types;Alcoff;‘,2007
2. Tracking Privilege-Preserving Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes;Bailey;Hypatia,2017
3. The Epistemology of Prejudice;Begby;Thought: A Journal of Philosophy,2013
4. Conceptual Ethics I;Burgess;Philosophy Compass,2013
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献