The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing

Author:

Hanson Kimberly E1,Caliendo Angela M2,Arias Cesar A3,Hayden Mary K4,Englund Janet A5,Lee Mark J6,Loeb Mark7,Patel Robin8,El Alayli Abdallah9,Altayar Osama10,Patel Payal11,Falck-Ytter Yngve12,Lavergne Valery13,Morgan Rebecca L14,Murad M Hassan15,Sultan Shahnaz16,Bhimraj Adarsh17,Mustafa Reem A18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

2. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, University of Texas Health McGovern Medical School, Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health School of Public Health, Houston, TX

4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

6. Department of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

7. Divinsion of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

8. Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

9. Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

10. Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

11. Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

12. VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio

13. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

14. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

15. Division of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

16. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota

17. Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

18. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Direct detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acids in respiratory tract specimens informs patient, healthcare institution and public health level decision-making. The numbers of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests are rapidly increasing, as is the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recognized a significant need for frequently updated systematic reviews of the literature to inform evidence-based best practice guidance. Objective The IDSA’s goal was to develop an evidence-based diagnostic guideline to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discuss the nuance of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings and highlight important unmet research needs in the COVID-19 diagnostic testing space. Methods IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. Results The panel agreed on 17 diagnostic recommendations. Conclusions Universal access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention and the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Information on the clinical performance of available tests is rapidly emerging, but the quality of evidence of the current literature is considered moderate to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is recommended for asymptomatic individuals with known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case. Testing asymptomatic individuals without known exposure is suggested when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment (PPE) usage decisions, dictate eligibility for surgery, or inform solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation timing. Ultimately, prioritization of testing will depend on institutional-specific resources and the needs of different patient populations.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3