Therapeutic Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) During Pandemics: Double-edged Swords

Author:

Bhimraj Adarsh1,Morgan Rebecca L2,Shumaker Amy Hirsch3,Lavergne Valery4,Baden Lindsey5,Cheng Vincent Chi-Chung6,Edwards Kathryn M7,Gandhi Rajesh T8,Gallagher Jason C9,Muller William J10,O’Horo John C11,Shoham Shmuel12,Wollins Dana Swartzberg13,Falck-Ytter Yngve3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

2. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

3. VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

5. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

6. Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, and Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

7. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

8. Infectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

9. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Temple University, Philadelphia,Pennsylvania  USA

10. Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

11. Division of Infectious Diseases, Joint Appointment Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

12. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USAand

13. Infectious Diseases Society of America, Arlington, Virginia, USA

Abstract

Abstract Given the urgent need for treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the US Food and Drug Administration issued emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for multiple therapies. In several instances, however, these EUAs were issued before sufficient evidence of a given therapy’s efficacy and safety were available, potentially promoting ineffective or even harmful therapies and undermining the generation of definitive evidence. We describe the strengths and weaknesses of the different therapeutic EUAs issued during this pandemic. We also contrast them to the vaccine EUAs and suggest a framework and criteria for an evidence-based, trustworthy, and publicly transparent therapeutic EUA process for future pandemics.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3