The Effectiveness of the Two-Dose BNT162b2 Vaccine: Analysis of Real-World Data

Author:

Chodick Gabriel12ORCID,Tene Lilac1,Rotem Ran S13,Patalon Tal1,Gazit Sivan1,Ben-Tov Amir12,Weil Clara1,Goldshtein Inbal12,Twig Gilad2456,Cohen Dani2,Muhsen Khitam2

Affiliation:

1. Maccabi Institute for Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel

2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

3. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, Ramat-Gan, Israel

5. Department of Military Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

6. Institute of Endocrinology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were shown to be highly efficacious in preventing the disease in randomized controlled trials; nonetheless, evidence on the real-world effectiveness of this vaccine is limited. Study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality. Methods This historical cohort study included members of a large health provider in Israel that were vaccinated with at least 1 dose of BNT162b2. The primary outcome was incidence rate of a SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR), between 7 and 27 days after second dose (protection-period), as compared to days 1–7 after the first dose, where no protection by the vaccine is assumed (reference-period). Results Data of 1 178 597 individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 were analyzed (mean age 47.7 years [SD = 18.1], 48.4% males) of whom 872 454 (74.0%) reached the protection period. Overall, 4514 infections occurred during the reference period compared to 728 during the protection period, yielding a weighted mean daily incidence of 54.8 per 100 000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.1–115.0 per 100 000) and 5.4 per 100 000 (95% CI: 3.5–8.4 per 100 000), respectively. The vaccine effectiveness in preventing infection was 90% (95% CI: 79%–95%) and 94% (95% CI: 88%–97%) against COVID-19. Among immunosuppressed patients, vaccine effectiveness against infection was 71% (95% CI: 37%–87%). The adjusted hazard ratios for hospitalization in those infected were 0.82 (95% CI: .36–1.88), 0.45 (95% CI: .23–.90), and 0.56 (95% CI: .36–.89) in the age groups 16–44, 45–64. and ≥75 years, respectively. Conclusions The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine is comparable to the one reported in the phase III clinical trial.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3