Predictors of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Following High-Risk Exposure

Author:

Andrejko Kristin L1,Pry Jake2,Myers Jennifer F2,Openshaw John2,Watt James2,Birkett Nozomi2,DeGuzman Jennifer L2,Barbaduomo Camilla M2,Dong Zheng N2,Fang Anna T2,Frost Paulina M2,Ho Timothy2,Javadi Mahsa H2,Li Sophia S2,Tran Vivian H2,Wan Christine2,Jain Seema2,Lewnard Joseph A134,Samani Helia,Walas Nikolina,Xavier Erin,Poindexter Diana J,Dabbagh Najla,Spinosa Michelle M,Saretha Shrey,Cornejo Adrian F,Park Hyemin,Bermejo Miriam I,Lam Amanda,Kaur Amandeep,Dyke Ashly,Felipe Diana,Spencer Maya,Corredor Savannah,Abdulrahim Yasmine,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

2. California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA

3. Division of Infectious Diseases & Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

4. Center for Computational Biology, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are recommended for COVID-19 prevention. However, the effectiveness of NPIs in preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission remains poorly quantified. Methods We conducted a test-negative design case-control study enrolling cases (testing positive for SARS-CoV-2) and controls (testing negative) with molecular SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results reported to California Department of Public Health between 24 February–12 November, 2021. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of case status among participants who reported contact with an individual known or suspected to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (“high-risk exposure”) ≤14 days before testing. Results 751 of 1448 cases (52%) and 255 of 1443 controls (18%) reported high-risk exposures ≤14 days before testing. Adjusted odds of case status were 3.02-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.75–5.22) higher when high-risk exposures occurred with household members (vs. other contacts), 2.10-fold (1.05–4.21) higher when exposures occurred indoors (vs. outdoors only), and 2.15-fold (1.27–3.67) higher when exposures lasted ≥3 hours (vs. shorter durations) among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated individuals; excess risk associated with such exposures was mitigated among fully-vaccinated individuals. Cases were less likely than controls to report mask usage during high-risk exposures (aOR = 0.50 [0.29–0.85]). The adjusted odds of case status was lower for fully-vaccinated (aOR = 0.25 [0.15–0.43]) participants compared to unvaccinated participants. Benefits of mask usage were greatest among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated participants, and in interactions involving non-household contacts or interactions occurring without physical contact. Conclusions NPIs reduced the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection following high-risk exposure. Vaccine effectiveness was substantial for partially and fully vaccinated persons.

Funder

California Department of Public Health

Epidemiology & Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3