Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0119, La Jolla, Ca 92093-0119, Usa
Abstract
Abstract
On the one hand, there seem to be compelling parallels to moral responsibility, blameworthiness, and praiseworthiness in domains other than the moral. For example, we often praise people for their aesthetic and epistemic achievements and blame them for their failures. On the other hand, it has been argued that there is something special about the moral domain, so that at least one robust kind of responsibility can only be found there. In this paper, I argue that we can adopt a unifying framework for locating responsible agency across domains, thereby capturing and explaining more of our actual practices. The key, I argue, is to identify the right conditions for being morally accountable, which I take to be a matter of having an opportunity of a good enough quality to act well. With this account in hand, I argue that we can adopt a unifying framework that allows us to recognize parallels across domains, even as it points the way to important differences among them.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference67 articles.
1. ‘Aesthetic Supererogation’;Archer;Estekia: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics,2017
2. Achievement
3. Fairness and the Architecture of Responsibility1
4. What is Epistemic Blame?;Brown;Noûs,2020
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Aesthetic Blame;Journal of the American Philosophical Association;2023-12-12
2. Two Dimensions of Responsibility: Quality and Competence of Will;Journal of the American Philosophical Association;2023-04-03
3. The Musicality of Speech;Philosophers' Imprint;2023-01-27
4. Index;Lotteries, Knowledge, and Rational Belief;2021-02-04
5. Bibliography;Lotteries, Knowledge, and Rational Belief;2021-02-04