Affiliation:
1. School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science University of Leeds Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT UK
2. School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 AUSTRALIA
Abstract
Abstract
How, if at all, can scientific progress improve our view of the modal facts? According to rationalist approaches to modal epistemology, science has no substantive role: a priori reflection reveals the structure of modal space, and a posteriori science merely locates us within that modal space, by identifying the actual properties and structures instantiated at our world. According to modal naturalist approaches, science provides evidence about the structure of the underlying modal space. In this paper I distinguish four versions of modal naturalism, with science playing an increasingly robust evidential role, and discuss their plausibility.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference57 articles.
1. What is a Law of Nature?
2. ‘The Philosophical Limits of Scientific Essentialism’;Bealer;Philosophical Perspectives,1987
3. Nature's Metaphysics
4. ‘On a confusion about a function of consciousness’;Block;The Nature of Consciousness. Philosophical Debates,1997