Affiliation:
1. University of Michigan Law School 3266 Jeffries Hall Ann Arbor, mi 48109 usa
Abstract
Abstract
Gambling on another person and relying on another person are similar but intuitively distinct phenomena. This paper argues that gambling is distinguished by the stance that it necessarily involves towards the bet-upon conduct. It then contends that, where one has gambled upon the conduct of another, one has no standing to complain against that person for losses that result. This small point may have significant implications for how we think about speculative economic losses.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference20 articles.
1. Trust and Antitrust;Baier;Ethics,1986
2. Two Caricatures i: Pascal’s Wager;Franklin;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion,1998
3. The Ethics of Gambling;Freeman;International Journal of Ethics,1907
4. The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages;Fuller;Yale Law Journal,1937