Estimating phylogenies from genomes: A beginners review of commonly used genomic data in vertebrate phylogenomics

Author:

Carter Javan K12ORCID,Kimball Rebecca T3ORCID,Funk Erik R14ORCID,Kane Nolan C1ORCID,Schield Drew R1ORCID,Spellman Garth M5ORCID,Safran Rebecca J1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, CO , United States

2. Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, Research Triangle Institute International , RTP, NC , United States

3. Department of Biology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL , United States

4. Department of Conservation Genetics, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance , Escondido, CA , United States

5. Department of Zoology, Denver Museum of Nature and Science , Denver, CO , United States

Abstract

AbstractDespite the increasing feasibility of sequencing whole genomes from diverse taxa, a persistent problem in phylogenomics is the selection of appropriate genetic markers or loci for a given taxonomic group or research question. In this review, we aim to streamline the decision-making process when selecting specific markers to use in phylogenomic studies by introducing commonly used types of genomic markers, their evolutionary characteristics, and their associated uses in phylogenomics. Specifically, we review the utilities of ultraconserved elements (including flanking regions), anchored hybrid enrichment loci, conserved nonexonic elements, untranslated regions, introns, exons, mitochondrial DNA, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and anonymous regions (nonspecific regions that are evenly or randomly distributed across the genome). These various genomic elements and regions differ in their substitution rates, likelihood of neutrality or of being strongly linked to loci under selection, and mode of inheritance, each of which are important considerations in phylogenomic reconstruction. These features may give each type of marker important advantages and disadvantages depending on the biological question, number of taxa sampled, evolutionary timescale, cost effectiveness, and analytical methods used. We provide a concise outline as a resource to efficiently consider key aspects of each type of genetic marker. There are many factors to consider when designing phylogenomic studies, and this review may serve as a primer when weighing options between multiple potential phylogenomic markers.

Funder

Research Triangle Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Biotechnology

Reference141 articles.

1. Split scores: a tool to quantify phylogenetic signal in genome-scale data;Allman;System. Biol.,2016

2. A guide to carrying out a phylogenomic target sequence capture project;Andermann;Front Genet,2020

3. Ultraconserved elements resolve genus-level relationships in a major Australasian bird radiation (Aves: Meliphagidae).;Andersen;Emu,2019

4. Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics;Andrews;Nat Rev Genet,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3