Factors Affecting Image Quality and Lesion Evaluability in Breast Diffusion-weighted MRI: Observations from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Multisite Trial (A6702)

Author:

Whisenant Jennifer G12,Romanoff Justin3,Rahbar Habib4ORCID,Kitsch Averi E4,Harvey Sara M5,Moy Linda6ORCID,DeMartini Wendy B7,Dogan Basak E8ORCID,Yang Wei T9,Wang Lilian C10,Joe Bonnie N11,Wilmes Lisa J11,Hylton Nola M11,Oh Karen Y12,Tudorica Luminita A12,Neal Colleen H13,Malyarenko Dariya I13,McDonald Elizabeth S14,Comstock Christopher E15,Yankeelov Thomas E16,Chenevert Thomas L13,Partridge Savannah C4

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Nashville, TN

2. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN

3. Brown University, Center for Statistical Sciences, Providence, RI

4. University of Washington, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA

5. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, TN

6. New York University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY

7. Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA

8. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dallas, TX

9. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Imaging, Houston, TX

10. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Chicago, IL

11. University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, San Francisco, CA

12. Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Radiology, Portland, OR

13. University of Michigan, Department of Radiology/MRI, Ann Arbor, MI

14. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA

15. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY

16. University of Texas Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, TX

Abstract

Abstract Objective The A6702 multisite trial confirmed that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measures can improve breast MRI accuracy and reduce unnecessary biopsies, but also found that technical issues rendered many lesions non-evaluable on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This secondary analysis investigated factors affecting lesion evaluability and impact on diagnostic performance. Methods The A6702 protocol was IRB-approved at 10 institutions; participants provided informed consent. In total, 103 women with 142 MRI-detected breast lesions (BI-RADS assessment category 3, 4, or 5) completed the study. DWI was acquired at 1.5T and 3T using a four b-value, echo-planar imaging sequence. Scans were reviewed for multiple quality factors (artifacts, signal-to-noise, misregistration, and fat suppression); lesions were considered non-evaluable if there was low confidence in ADC measurement. Associations of lesion evaluability with imaging and lesion characteristics were determined. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were compared using bootstrapping. Results Thirty percent (42/142) of lesions were non-evaluable on DWI; 23% (32/142) with image quality issues, 7% (10/142) with conspicuity and/or localization issues. Misregistration was the only factor associated with non-evaluability (P = 0.001). Smaller (≤10 mm) lesions were more commonly non-evaluable than larger lesions (p <0.03), though not significant after multiplicity correction. The AUC for differentiating benign and malignant lesions increased after excluding non-evaluable lesions, from 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50–0.71) to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65–0.84). Conclusion Image quality remains a technical challenge in breast DWI, particularly for smaller lesions. Protocol optimization and advanced acquisition and post-processing techniques would help to improve clinical utility.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3