Abstract
AbstractMany developing economies adopt industrial policies favoring selected sectors. Is there an economic logic to this type of intervention? I analyze industrial policy when economic sectors form a production network via input-output linkages. Market imperfections generate distortionary effects that compound through backward demand linkages, causing upstream sectors to become the sink for imperfections and have the greatest size distortions. My key finding is that the distortion in sectoral size is a sufficient statistic for the social value of promoting that sector; thus, there is an incentive for a well-meaning government to subsidize upstream sectors. Furthermore, sectoral interventions’ aggregate effects can be simply summarized, to first order, by the cross-sector covariance between my sufficient statistic and subsidy spending. My sufficient statistic predicts sectoral policies in South Korea in the 1970s and modern-day China, suggesting that sectoral interventions might have generated positive aggregate effects in these economies.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference85 articles.
1. Networks and the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Exploration;Acemoglu;NBER Macroeconomics Annual,2016
2. The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations;Acemoglu;Econometrica,2012
3. Microeconomic Origins of Macroeconomic Tail Risks;Acemoglu;American Economic Review,2017
4. Industrial Policy and Competition;Aghion;American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics,2015
5. The Theory of Reform and Indian Indirect Taxes;Ahmad;Journal of Public Economics,1984
Cited by
171 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献