Affiliation:
1. University of California, Berkeley, and National Bureau of Economic Research
2. Stanford University and National Bureau of Economic Research
Abstract
Abstract
We show that most U.S. food, drugstore, and mass-merchandise chains charge nearly uniform prices across stores, despite wide variation in consumer demographics and competition. Demand estimates reveal substantial within-chain variation in price elasticities and suggest that the median chain sacrifices ${\$}$16 million of annual profit relative to a benchmark of optimal prices. In contrast, differences in average prices between chains are broadly consistent with the optimal benchmark. We discuss a range of explanations for nearly uniform pricing, highlighting managerial inertia and brand image concerns as mechanisms frequently mentioned by industry participants. Relative to our optimal benchmark, uniform pricing may significantly increase the prices paid by poorer households relative to the rich, dampen the response of prices to local economic shocks, alter the analysis of mergers in antitrust, and shift the incidence of intranational trade costs.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference63 articles.
1. Zone Pricing in Retail Oligopoly;Adams;American Economic Journal: Microeconomics,2019
2. Food Deserts and the Causes of Nutritional Inequality;Allcott;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2019
3. Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax;Allcott;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2019
4. Informational Rigidities and the Stickiness of Temporary Sales;Anderson;Journal of Monetary Economics,2017
5. Trade Costs;Anderson;Journal of Economic Literature,2004
Cited by
197 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献