Funding of evidence included within public comments submitted to inform Medicare national coverage determinations

Author:

Lu Angela12ORCID,Ji Robin Z13,Magee Marley P D4ORCID,Ross Joseph S5678ORCID,Ramachandran Reshma56ORCID,Redberg Rita F910,Dhruva Sanket S11011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA 94143 , United States

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN 55905 , United States

3. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago , Chicago, IL 60637 , United States

4. University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA 90095 , United States

5. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT 06510 , United States

6. Yale Collaboration for Regulatory Rigor, Integrity, and Transparency (CRRIT), Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT 06510 , United States

7. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health , New Haven, CT 06510 , United States

8. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital , New Haven, CT 06510 , United States

9. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine , San Francisco, CA 94143 , United States

10. Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA 94143 , United States

11. Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center , San Francisco, CA 94121 , United States

Abstract

Abstract The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on public comments submitted in response to proposed national coverage determinations to assist the agency in determining the coverage of items and services for Medicare beneficiaries. In a cross-sectional study, we characterized the cited evidence and what funding supported the cited evidence submitted in public comments to CMS for all therapeutic medical device national coverage determinations finalized between June 2019 and June 2022. Of 681 public comments, 159 (23%) cited at least 1 identifiable published scientific journal article. Within these 159 public comments, 198 unique articles were cited, 170 (86%) of which included funding statements or author disclosures. Among these, 96 (56%) disclosed funding from manufacturers that would benefit from Medicare coverage and/or were written by author(s) who received funding from these manufacturers. In summary, most public commenters for national coverage determinations did not cite published scientific journal articles to support their positions. Among those who did, more than half of articles were directly funded by manufacturers that would benefit from coverage. Greater funding of independent, non–industry-supported research may help provide unbiased evaluations of benefits and harms to support Medicare coverage decisions.

Funder

Arnold Ventures

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference34 articles.

1. New Medicare coverage policy for next-generation tumor sequencing: a key shift in coverage criteria with broad implications beyond Medicare;Phillips;JCO Precis Oncol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3