US payment policy for medications to treat opioid use disorder: landscape and opportunities

Author:

McGinty Emma E1,White Sarah A2ORCID,Eisenberg Matthew D2,Palmer Nicole R3ORCID,Brown C Hendricks4ORCID,Saloner Brendan K2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Health Policy and Economics, Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, NY 10065 , United States

2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD 21205 , United States

3. Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, NY 10065 , United States

4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL 60611 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Offering patients medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD), but an estimated 75%–90% of people with OUD who could benefit from MOUD do not receive medication. Payment policy, defined as public and private payers’ approaches to covering and reimbursing providers for MOUD, is 1 contributor to this treatment gap. We conducted a policy analysis and qualitative interviews (n = 21) and surveys (n = 31) with US MOUD payment policy experts to characterize MOUD insurance coverage across major categories of US insurers and identify opportunities for reform and innovation. Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid all provide coverage for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone for OUD. Private insurance coverage varies by carrier and by plan, with methadone most likely to be excluded. The experts interviewed cautioned against rigid reimbursement models that force patients into one-size-fits-all care and endorsed future development and adoption of value-based MOUD payment models. More than 70% of experts surveyed reported that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers should increase payment for office- and opioid treatment program–based MOUD. Validation of MOUD performance metrics is needed to support future value-based initiatives.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3