“More than just checking the box”: community-based organizations on their role in Medicaid redesigns

Author:

Tsering Dolma1ORCID,Stauffer Claire M2ORCID,Gittzus Jordan A3,Byhoff Elena4ORCID,Taylor Lauren A5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Yale University , Department of Health Policy and Management, New Haven, CT 06510 , United States

2. Veterans Health Administration , West Roxbury, MA 02132 , United States

3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA 02215 , United States

4. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School , Worcester, MA 01655 , United States

5. NYU Grossman School of Medicine , NewYork, NY 10016 , United States

Abstract

Abstract New York and Massachusetts 1115 Medicaid demonstration waivers aimed to prioritize social determinants of health and engage community-based organizations to improve health outcomes. This is an evaluation of community-based organizations' public comments regarding their participation in social services delivery within the 1115 waivers. Both states solicited public comments on waiver implementation to date and potential improvements. The research team extracted all publicly available comments (n = 359) made by direct service providers between November 2016 and April 2019. The sample was then limited to only comments that discussed social service provision and health care–social service partnerships (n = 58). Findings are presented in 2 stages: (1) concerns regarding delivery system reform incentive payments funding levels, timing, and flow and (2) perspectives on how states and Medicaid administrators could improve health care–community organization relationships. Resource-dependent, community-based organizations protested insufficient funding. Additional comments identified specific design, structure, and implementation aspects of the 1115 waiver that could improve partnerships. Despite 1115 waivers prioritizing social service integration, community-based organizations still feel underfunded and disenfranchised. Aligning with health care standards requires significant time and effort. Given resource constraints, the state must facilitate these investments. Community organizations’ feedback can also offer guidance on waiver strategies in other states.

Funder

National Institution on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3