Programmatic quality measures: a new model to promote surgical quality

Author:

Peters Xane12ORCID,Sage Jill3ORCID,Collins Courtney4ORCID,Opelka Frank3ORCID,Ko Clifford156

Affiliation:

1. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons , Chicago, IL 60611 , United States

2. Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center , Maywood, IL 60153 , United States

3. Division of Advocacy and Health Policy, American College of Surgeons , Washington, DC 20001 , United States

4. Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH 43210 , United States

5. University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine , Los Angeles, CA 90024 , United States

6. Department of Surgery, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System , Los Angeles, CA 90073 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Health care performance metrics are offered predominantly in terms of outcomes, processes, or structural components of health care delivery. However, measurement is limited by variability in data sources, definitions, and workarounds. The American College of Surgeons has recently developed a new type of performance metric known as a “programmatic measure”. These metrics align structures, processes, and outcomes to better coordinate quality measurement with support of frontline care teams. In this multifaceted way, these measures differ from current “single” measures such as targeting surgical site infection. The thematic focus of these measures and alignment of structure-resource components to support processes and outcomes also sets these measures apart from contemporary composite measures. Importantly, structural elements of these measures reflect minimum resources required for patient care, addressing staffing and resource barriers felt by local institutions in addressing numerous existing quality metrics. These metrics will streamline quality reporting to improve care navigation for patients. Clinicians will find more appropriately aligned goals and responsibilities, resulting in increased teamwork and communication. These measures are designed to address the current burdens of overabundant metrics, priority misalignment, and low resources in a patient-centric fashion to better align health care quality and measurement.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference11 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3