Commercial coverage of specialty drugs, 2017–2021

Author:

Rucker Julia A1ORCID,Beinfeld Molly T1,Jenkins Nola B1ORCID,Enright Daniel E1,Henderson Rochelle R2,Chambers James D1

Affiliation:

1. Tufts Medical Center, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Boston, MA 02111 , United States

2. National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC 20006 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Health plans guide their enrollees’ access to specialty drugs through coverage policies. We examined a set of health plan policies to determine if they have become more or less stringent over time. We did so by comparing the consistency of policies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label indications. We considered coverage policies for the same 187 specialty drugs issued by 17 large US commercial health plans from 2017 through 2021. Overall, the proportion of policies that were consistent with the FDA label declined from 57.1% in 2017 to 45.1% in 2021; the proportion of policies that were more restrictive than the FDA label increased from 39.5% to 51.7%. The proportion of policies excluding drug coverage remained approximately constant (3.4% in 2017; 3.2% in 2021). Trends in coverage restrictiveness varied across plans. For 13 plans, the proportion of policies with restrictions increased over time, while for 4 plans it declined.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference16 articles.

1. Benefits of prior authorizations;Forrester;J Manag Care Spec Pharm,2020

2. Specialty drug coverage varies across commercial health plans in the US;Chambers;Health Aff (Millwood),2018

3. Variation in use and content of prescription drug step therapy protocols, within and across health plans;Lenahan;Health Aff (Millwood),2021

4. Payer-imposed quantity limits for antiemetics: everybody hurts;Haque;JCO Oncol Pract,2022

5. Use of prescriber requirements among US commercial health plans;Lenahan;J Manag Care Spec Pharm,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3