Measuring value in health care: lessons from accountable care organizations

Author:

Bao Chenzhang1ORCID,Bardhan Indranil R2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Management Science and Information Systems, Oklahoma State University , Tulsa, OK 74106 , United States

2. Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, Red McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX 78712 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Accountable care organizations (ACOs) were created to promote health care value by improving health outcomes while curbing health care expenditures. Although a decade has passed, the value of care delivered by ACOs is yet to be fully understood. We proposed a novel measure of health care value using data envelopment analysis and examined its association with ACO organizational characteristics and social determinants of health (SDOH). We observed that the value of care delivered by ACOs stagnated in recent years, which may be partially attributed to challenges in care continuity and coordination across providers. ACOs that were solely led by physicians and included more participating entities exhibited lower value, highlighting the role of coordination across ACO networks. Furthermore, SDOH factors, such as economic well-being, healthy food consumption, and access to health resources, were significant predictors of ACO value. Our findings suggest a “skinny in scale, broad in scope” approach for ACOs to improve the value of care. Health care policy should also incentivize ACOs to work with local communities and enhance care coordination of vulnerable patient populations across siloed and disparate care delivery systems.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference29 articles.

1. The effects of Medicare accountable organizations on inpatient mortality rates;Cutler;Inquiry,2018

2. The association between hospital ACO participation and readmission rates;Duggal;J Healthc Manag,2018

3. Impact of accountable care organizations on utilization, care, and outcomes: a systematic review;Kaufman;Med Care Res Rev,2019

4. Savings or selection? Initial spending reductions in the Medicare shared savings program and considerations for reform;McWilliams;Milbank Q,2020

5. Collaboration structures in integrated healthcare delivery systems: an exploratory study of accountable care organizations;Lan;Manuf Serv Oper Manag,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3