Sexual orientation–based disparities in food security among adults in the United States: results from the 2003–2016 NHANES

Author:

Gibb James K12ORCID,Shokoohi Mostafa3ORCID,Salway Travis456ORCID,Ross Lori E3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health & Society, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

5. British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

6. Centre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Access to sufficient, safe, culturally appropriate, and nutritious food is essential for maintaining both physical and mental health. Despite a growing body of evidence suggesting that sexual minority (SM) people experience significant disparities in socioeconomic and material resource security, there remains a paucity of empirical studies examining the prevalence of food insecurity among SM people relative to their heterosexual peers. Objectives To determine the prevalence of adult and household food insecurity across sexual orientation groups in the United States after adjusting for multiple covariates. Methods We combined 7 cycles of US NHANES, 2003–2016 (N = 21,300) to examine sexual orientation–based disparities in adult food security among lesbian/gay (n = 373), bisexual (n = 606), same-sex experienced (SSE, n = 693), other sexual minorities (OSMs, n = 88), and heterosexual (n = 19,540) people. Food (in)security was measured using the US Food Security Survey Module and categorized as secure, marginally insecure, moderately insecure, and severely insecure. Results Severe adult food insecurity was higher among bisexuals (17.16%; 95% CI: 14.36, 20.38), SSE (13.71%; 95% CI: 11.34, 16.48), OSMs (12.50%; 95% CI: 7.04, 21.24), and lesbians/gays (13.14%; 95% CI: 10.07, 16.97) compared with heterosexuals (8.23%; 95% CI: 7.85, 8.62). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusting for gender, race/ethnicity, age, citizenship, education, household size, income, cycle year, emergency food use, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation showed that bisexuals, OSMs, SSE, and lesbians/gays were more likely to experience moderate to severe food insecurity compared with heterosexuals. Conclusions SM people are significantly more likely to experience increased likelihood of food insecurity relative to their heterosexual peers.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Coping and the biosocial consequences of food insecurity in the 21st century;Hadley;Am J Phys Anthropol,2012

2. Food insecurity, loneliness, and social support among older adults;Burris;J Hunger Environ Nutr,2019

3. The association between food insecurity and inflammation in the US adult population;Gowda;Am J Public Health,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3