No additional benefit of prescribing a very low-protein diet in patients with advanced Chronic Kidney Disease under regular nephrology care: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial

Author:

Bellizzi Vincenzo1ORCID,Signoriello Simona2,Minutolo Roberto3ORCID,Di Iorio Biagio4,Nazzaro Paola5,Garofalo Carlo3,Calella Patrizia1,Chiodini Paolo2,De Nicola Luca3ORCID,Bellizzi Vincenzo6,Torraca Serena6,Mascia Sara6,Calella Patrizia6,Chiodini Paolo7,Signoriello Simona7,Conte Giuseppe8,Minutolo Roberto8,Garofalo Carlo8,De Nicola Luca8,Iorio Biagio Di9,De Simone Walter9,Zito Bruno9,De Blasio Antonella9,Nazzaro Paola10,Micco Lucia Di11,Provenzano Michele12,Gesualdo Loreto13,Manno Carlo13,Pastore Antonio14,Querques Mario15,Coppola Salvatore16,Guastaferro Pasquale17,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nephrology, University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona”, Salerno

2. Medical Statistics Unit

3. Division of Nephrology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples

4. Nephrology Unit, Moscati Hospital, Avellino

5. Nephrology Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, Campobasso, Italy

6. Nephrology-University Hospital, Salerno

7. Medical Statistics Unit-University Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” Napoli

8. Nephrology-University Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli

9. Nephrology-Moscati Hospital Avellino

10. Nephrology-Cardarelli Hospital, Campobasso

11. Nephrology-Del Mare Hospital, Napoli

12. Nephrology-University “Magna Grecia”, Catanzaro

13. Nephrology-University, Bari

14. Nephrology-Hospital Brindisi

15. Nephrology-Hospital Foggia

16. Nephrology-Hospital Piedimonte Matese

17. Nephrology-Hospital S. Angelo Lombardi

Abstract

Abstract Background Whether very low-protein diet supplemented with ketoanalogs (sVLPD), compared to standard low-protein diet (LPD), improves outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients under stable nephrology care is undefined. Objective To compare the effectiveness of sVLPD vs LPD in patients regularly seen in tertiary nephrology care. Methods Participants were CKD patients stage 4-5, followed for at least six months, randomized to receive sVLPD or LPD (0.35 or 0.60 g/kg Ideal Body Weight (IBW)/day, respectively), stratified by center and CKD stage. The primary outcome was time to renal death, defined as the first event between end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were the single components of the primary outcome, cardiovascular outcome, and nutritional status. Results We analysed 223 patients (sVLPD n = 107; LPD n = 116). Mean age was 64 years, 61% were male, 35% had diabetes. Median protein intake (PI), that was 0.8 g/kg IBW/day at baseline in both groups, was 0.83 and 0.60 g/kg IBW/day in LPD and sVLPD, respectively, during the trial with a large decrease only in sVLPD (P = 0.011). During a median of 74.2 months, we recorded 180 renal deaths (141 dialysis and 39 deaths before dialysis). Risk of renal death did not differ in sVLPD vs LPD (HR 1.17, 95%CI 0.88,1.57, P = 0.28). No difference was observed for ESRD (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.81,1.56, P = 0.51), mortality (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.62,1.45, P = 0.82) or time to fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events (P-value log-rank test = 0.2). After 36 months, still active patients were 45 in sVLPD and 56 in LPD. No change of nutritional status emerged during the study in any arm. Conclusions This long-term pragmatic trial found that in CKD patients under stable nephrology care, adherence to protein restriction is low. Prescribing sVLPD versus standard LPD was safe but does not provide additional advantage to the kidney or patient survival.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3