Strengthening national nutrition research: rationale and options for a new coordinated federal research effort and authority

Author:

Fleischhacker Sheila E1ORCID,Woteki Catherine E2,Coates Paul M3,Hubbard Van S3,Flaherty Grace E4,Glickman Daniel R5,Harkin Thomas R6,Kessler David7,Li William W8,Loscalzo Joseph9,Parekh Anand10,Rowe Sylvia11,Stover Patrick J12,Tagtow Angie13,Yun Anthony Joon14,Mozaffarian Dariush4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fly Health, LLC and Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA

2. University of Virginia Biocomplexity Institute and Initiative, Arlington, VA, USA

3. Retired, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

4. Gerald J and Dorothy R Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA

5. The Aspen Institute, Washington, DC, USA

6. Retired US Senator, Des Moines, IA, USA

7. Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner, College Park, MD, USA

8. The Angiogenesis Foundation, Cambridge, MA, USA

9. Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

10. Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, USA

11. SR Strategy, Washington, DC, USA

12. Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX, USA

13. Äkta Strategies LLC, Des Moines, IA, USA

14. Yun Family Foundation, San Mateo, CA, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The US faces remarkable food and nutrition challenges. A new federal effort to strengthen and coordinate nutrition research could rapidly generate the evidence base needed to address these multiple national challenges. However, the relevant characteristics of such an effort have been uncertain. Objectives Our aim was to provide an objective, informative summary of 1) the mounting diet-related health burdens facing our nation and corresponding economic, health equity, national security, and sustainability implications; 2) the current federal nutrition research landscape and existing mechanisms for its coordination; 3) the opportunities for and potential impact of new fundamental, clinical, public health, food and agricultural, and translational scientific discoveries; and 4) the various options for further strengthening and coordinating federal nutrition research, including corresponding advantages, disadvantages, and potential executive and legislative considerations. Methods We reviewed government and other published documents on federal nutrition research; held various discussions with expert groups, advocacy organizations, and scientific societies; and held in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as well as with a variety of other stakeholders in academic, industry, and nongovernment organizations. Results Stark national nutrition challenges were identified. More Americans are sick than are healthy, largely from rising diet-related illnesses. These conditions create tremendous strains on productivity, health care costs, health disparities, government budgets, US economic competitiveness, and military readiness. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has further laid bare these strains, including food insecurity, major diet-related comorbidities for poor outcomes from COVID-19 such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and insufficient surveillance on and coordination of our food system. More than 10 federal departments and agencies currently invest in critical nutrition research, yet with relatively flat investments over several decades. Coordination also remains suboptimal, documented by multiple governmental reports over 50 years. Greater harmonization and expansion of federal investment in nutrition science, not a silo-ing or rearrangement of existing investments, has tremendous potential to generate new discoveries to improve and sustain the health of all Americans. Two identified key strategies to achieve this were as follows: 1) a new authority for robust cross-governmental coordination of nutrition research and other nutrition-related policy and 2) strengthened authority, investment, and coordination for nutrition research within the NIH. These strategies were found to be complementary, together catalyzing important new science, partnerships, coordination, and returns on investment. Additional complementary actions to accelerate federal nutrition research were identified at the USDA. Conclusions The need and opportunities for strengthened federal nutrition research are clear, with specific identified options to help create the new leadership, strategic planning, coordination, and investment the nation requires to address the multiple nutrition-related challenges and grasp the opportunities before us.

Funder

Rockefeller Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference341 articles.

1. The state of US health, 1990–2016: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US states;US Burden of Disease Collaborators;JAMA,2018

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;US Department of Health and Human Services

3. How your diet can help flatten the curve;Mozaffarian

4. For millions of low-income seniors, coronavirus is a food-security issue;Goger,2020

5. How poor diet contributes to coronavirus risk;Brody

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3