Reproducibility and validity of diet quality scores derived from food-frequency questionnaires

Author:

Yue Yiyang1ORCID,Yuan Changzheng123,Wang Dong D14,Wang Molin35,Song Mingyang15ORCID,Shan Zhilei1,Hu Frank135,Rosner Bernard34,Smith-Warner Stephanie A15ORCID,Willett Walter C135ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

2. Department of Big Data and Health Science, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

3. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

4. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

5. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Diet quality scores (DQSs) are frequently used to study diet–disease relations but the validity of these scores derived from FFQs has rarely been evaluated. Objectives To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of 6 commonly used DQSs derived from the FFQ, including the Alternate Healthy Eating Index–2010, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial score, alternative Mediterranean diet score, and 3 plant-based diet indices (overall, healthful, and unhealthful). Methods This analysis included 1394 participants from the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study (N = 652) and the Women's Lifestyle Validation Study (N = 742). Participants completed a 152-item FFQ at the beginning of the study and 1 y later, as well as completed 2 weighed 7-d dietary records (7DDRs) and donated 2 blood samples 6 mo apart between FFQ assessments. The reproducibility of the FFQs was evaluated by rank intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The validity was assessed by comparing FFQ-derived DQSs with those from the average of two 7DDRs using Spearman rank correlation coefficients deattenuated for random measurement error in the 7DDRs (rs). Furthermore, we calculated the correlations between DQSs and plasma biomarkers of diet, including fatty acids, folate, carotenoids, retinol, and α- and γ-tocopherol. Results Six FFQ-derived DQSs demonstrated moderate to high reproducibility (energy-adjusted ICCs: 0.61–0.84) and validity (energy-adjusted, deattenuated rs = 0.56–0.80) in both men and women. We consistently observed expected correlations between FFQ-derived DQSs with plasma fatty acids, including long-chain n–3 (ω-3) and trans fatty acids, most carotenoids, and γ-tocopherol (rs > 0.2). Conclusions Our study demonstrates the validity of the FFQ to evaluate overall diet quality using 6 commonly used DQSs. In addition, these DQSs have qualitatively demonstrated biological relevance, as indicated by their correlations with circulating biomarkers.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3