Abstract
The increased use of models with limited-dependent variables has allowed researchers to test important relationships in political science. Often, however, researchers employing such models fail to acknowledge that the violation of some basic assumptions has in part difference consequences in nonlinear models than in linear ones. In this paper, I demonstrate this for binary probit models in which the dependent variable is systematically miscoded. Contrary to the linear model, such misclassifications affect not only the estimate of the intercept but also those of the other coefficients. In a Monte Carlo simulation, I demonstrate that a model proposed by Hausman, Abrevaya, and Scott-Morton (1998, Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting.Journal of Econometrics87:239–69) allows for correcting these biases in binary probit models. Empirical examples based on reanalyses of models explaining the occurrence of rebellions and civil wars demonstrate the problem that comes from neglecting these misclassifications.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference39 articles.
1. Specification error in probit models;Yatchew;Review of Economics and Statistics,1985
2. Greed, Grievance, and Mobilization in Civil Wars
3. IDENTIFICATION OF THE BINARY CHOICE MODEL WITH MISCLASSIFICATION
4. Selection Bias in Comparative Research: The Case of Incomplete Data Sets
5. Below I also use the absolute value of the estimated parameter to ensure positive values. This, however, only works if no explanatory variables are used to explain the probability of misclassification. In that latter case, I use the normal cumulative density function.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献