Survey of patients and physicians on shared decision-making in treatment selection in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Author:

Bylund Carma L1,Eggly Susan2,LeBlanc Thomas W34,Kurtin Sandra5,Gandee Marianne6,Medhekar Rohan7,Fu Alan7,Khurana Monica7,Delaney Kara8,Divita Alecia8,McNamara Michelle8,Baile Walter F9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL , USA

2. Wayne State University Department of Oncology/Karmanos Cancer Institute , Detroit, MI , USA

3. Duke Cancer Institute , Durham, NC , USA

4. Division of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, NC , USA

5. University of Arizona and Arizona Cancer Center , Tucson, AZ , USA

6. Association of Community Cancer Centers , Rockville, MD , USA

7. Research and Development, Amgen Inc. , Thousand Oaks, CA , USA

8. Adelphi Group , Doylestown, PA , USA

9. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX , USA

Abstract

AbstractShared decision-making (SDM) is a key component of patient-centered healthcare. SDM is particularly pertinent in the relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) setting, in which numerous treatment options can present challenges for identifying optimal care. However, few studies have assessed the extent and relevance of SDM and patient-centered communication (PCC) in RRMM. To describe treatment decision-making patterns between physicians and patients in the RRMM setting, we conducted online surveys of patients and physicians in the USA to compare their perspectives on the process of treatment decision-making. We analyzed the surveys descriptively. Two hundred hematologists/oncologists and 200 patients with RRMM receiving second-line (n = 89), third-line (n = 65), and fourth-line (n = 46) therapy participated. Top treatment goals for physicians and patients included extending overall survival (among 76% and 83% of physicians and patients, respectively) and progression-free survival (among 54% and 77% of physicians and patients, respectively), regardless of the number of prior relapses. Thirty percent of physicians believed patients preferred a shared approach to treatment decision-making, while 40% of patients reported most often preferring a shared role in treatment decision-making. One-fourth of patients most often preferred physicians to make the final treatment decision after seriously considering their opinion. Thirty-two percent of physicians and 16% of patients recalled ≥3 treatment options presented at first relapse. Efficacy was a primary treatment goal for patients and physicians. Discrepancies in their perceptions during RRMM treatment decision-making exist, indicating that communication tools are needed to facilitate SDM and PCC.

Funder

Amgen, Inc

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3