Jury Decision-Making

Abstract

AbstractJurors bring their previous knowledge, experience, and stereotypes with them into the courtroom. The gendered nature of intimate partner violence (IPV) can lead to assumptions and stereotypes (often unconsciously) that lead to differential treatment of others who may not fit the stereotype of a victim of IPV. This chapter addresses the potential for inherent bias in jury decision-making and provides insight into how jurors make decisions; it provides an in-depth review of empirical research on jury decision-making in cases of assault, self-defense, and intimate partner homicide. Topics include defendant typicality/atypicality, various forms and motivations for IPV, battered woman syndrome stereotypes, juror gender, and the use of expert testimony. We conclude with ways to reduce potential bias and areas of future research.